CREATIONISTS: WHAT
IF...
http://www.fixedearth.com/what-if.html
God's Word means
EXACTLY what It says about the sun going around a non-moving earth
(and not the earth going around the sun)??
Indeed, what has God
said on that subject?? Here are some examples:
"SUN, stand
THOU still.... And THE SUN stood still." (Joshua 10:12, 13)
"The world
also is STABLISHED [i.e., “fixed" #3529 Strong's Con.] that
IT CANNOT BE MOVED." (Psalm 93:1)
"The sun AND
the moon stood still in their habitation." (Habakkuk 3:11)
"He appointed
the moon for seasons: the sun knoweth his GOING DOWN." (Psalm
104:19)
"...the world
also shall be stable [fixed], that it be NOT moved." (I Chron.
16:30)
"He...hangeth
the earth upon nothing." (Job 26:7)
"The sun ALSO
ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hastens to his place where he
arose." (Eccl.1:5)
"...so the sun
RETURNED ten degrees...." (Isaiah 38:8)
God..."commandeth
the sun, and it riseth not." (Job 9:7)
"...the sun
shall be darkened in his going forth." (Isaiah 13:10)
"The heavens
declare the glory of God.... In them hath He set a tabernacle for the
sun, which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and
rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race. His going forth is from the
end of the heaven, and his CIRCUIT [orbit] unto the ends of it: and
there is nothing hid from the heat thereof." (Psalm 19:1, 4-6)
Add to these, Dozens of
Sun Risings and Settings, etc...![See: Sixty-seven References]
Truly, as one scholar,
a Creationist and a Geocentrist, wrote: "...it is evident that
geocentricity [a non-moving earth...] and the inerrant preservation
of the Scriptures are intertwined." (Prof. Hanson, Tychonian
Bulletin, S.89,p.21)
By way of contrast,
another scholar, a Creationist and a Heliocentrist, says that he:
"...supports inerrancy and the verbal inspiration of the Bible",
but nevertheless declares that in all the Scriptures above the Holy
Spirit employed a "language of appearance" which gives the
reader license to change the meaning to fit the heliocentric
teaching. (Dr. DeYoung, Audio tape debate with M. Selbrede)
(Bible believing
Christians are urged to try applying DeYoung's "language of
appearance" technique to "the evening and the morning were
the first [thru sixth] day"...or to the virgin birth...or the
resurrection, etc., and see where you come out!)
Anyway,
SOME FURTHER "WHAT
IFS" FOR CREATIONISTS ABOUT GEOCENTRICITY ARE QUITE REVEALING:
WHAT IF - Kepler's
mother was a witch and he was raised a warlock assigned to bump Brahe
off, [See: Brahe Poisoning] wreck his work, steal his records, and
twist them to promote Copernicanism and help pave the way for
evolutionism (which he wrote about 250 years before Darwin)? [See:
Insep-Conc, (pp.1,2)]
WHAT IF - Galileo
offered no proof whatsoever for heliocentricity but did all he could
to elevate secular science over Bible science, thereby contributing
greatly to the establishment of the mindset that later served
evolutionism so well? [See: Popes Condemed-Embraced]
WHAT IF -
Creationists can know that Copernicanism is the demonstrable
precursor of evolutionism both as Bible destroyer and as the
guarantor that the anti-Bible false science establishment would
become modern man's criterion of Truth Itself? [See: Symbiotic
Relationship, Knowledge Impact]
WHAT IF - the Bible
teaches a stationary earth (just like everyone agreed it did until
Copernican and finally Newton's Kabbalist "mathematics"
scared the churches into thinking that "science" had proof
of heliocentricity)? [See: Gram-Semant - Sola Scriptura 4]
WHAT IF -
Einstein's admission that "fantasy" meant more to him than
"positive knowledge" is demonstrated most powerfully in his
Relativity hypothesis, (that pseudo-mathematical "great work of
art" that rescued a moribund Copernicanism and fostered and
vivified evolution-based Marxism, Freudianism and Humanism)? [See:
TSE Pt 2-Hist.BigBang]
WHAT IF -
mathematics has long since been an art form capable of depicting
anything the "artist" wants? (And what if the ultimate
"artist" behind heliocentric (moving earth) mathematics is
not men but You-Know-Who?!) [See: Pythagoras]
WHAT IF - the
Michelson-Morley experiments and scores of other
affirmations--particularly regarding the light fringe
results--essentially prove no earth orbit around the sun? [See: The
Earth Is Not Moving (pp.97-104)]
WHAT IF -
Relativism--the savior of Copernicanism almost a century ago and the
temporary victor over God's Absolutism since then--is merely a thick
slice of pseudo-scientific baloney and can be shown to be so? [See:
The Earth Is Not Moving (pp. 110-133)]
WHAT IF - God has
allowed the deceptive power of Satan to be great enough thus far to
prevent Creationists (and other believers in Bible inerrancy) from
seeing that Copernicanism--just like evolutionism--has NO scientific
proof whatever to support its "science-fiction" claims?
[See: NASAs Agenda]
WHAT IF - "Ah
LORD God!...There is nothing too hard for thee" (Jer.32:17; et
al!) is applied to the orbital speeds required for stars in the
"small" geocentric universe? [See: Size-Structure Pt 1]
WHAT IF - The
alleged discoveries of "Dark Matter" and the anomalies
associated with it regarding speed portend a radical revision in the
speed-of-light dogma?
WHAT IF - The
universe--because of complex matters involving parallax and
"non-Euclidian geometry", the vagaries of reflections,
etc.--is much, much, smaller than we are told? [See: Small Universe,
Size-Structure Pt 4]
WHAT IF - It is
God's Plan to first expose Copernicanism as a scientific fraud (as a
certain means to bringing down not only evolutionism but the whole
secular scientific establishment idol)? [See: Atheism]
WHAT IF - The
Copernican Model is essential to the "extra-terrestrial"
hype which is nothing more nor less than a highly effective
propaganda campaign for evolutionism (...we "evolved" here
and "they...evolved out there")? [See: TSE Pt 1-Cosmic
Ancestry]
WHAT IF - Darwin's
German Bulldog and Marx's Right Hand Man Recognized the Unbreakable
Link Between Darwinism and Copernicanism?
WHAT IF - Hitler,
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, et al were all fervent believers in and zealous
promoters of Darwinian Evolutionism and the Copernican
Heliocentricity that preceded it? [See: hlsm]
WHAT IF - Today's
Copernican-dependent, evolution-based "creation scenario"
for the Universe, the Earth and all life forms including mankind is
directly derived from ancient and current writings of Bible-bashing,
Christ-hating Rabbinical Kabbalists?? [See: Kabbala 3 - Kabbala 6]
WHAT IF, WHAT IF, WHAT
IF....?
Answered honestly
from all known evidence, we know that these "What If's" add
up to one inescapable Truth. That Truth is that the Bible is just
what it claims to be, namely, the inerrant, sufficient, infallible
Word of the living God who cannot lie.
So, as a
Creationist, what if you have to stand up for the plain Biblical
non-moving Earth because: a) It is a pivotal feature of the Genesis
Creation Account wherein (in addition to the hard evidence at this
site) there was no sun to go around until the 4th day; b) The alleged
size and age of the universe which provide the billions of years for
the evolution hypothesis self-destructs without heliocentricity, and
continued support of heliocentricity while claiming to be a literal
six-day Creationist is hypocrisy; c) The now available facts
demonstrating that all the concepts upholding the
heliocentricity-dependent Big Bang Paradigm of 15 billion years of
evolutionism comprise an alternate "creation scenario" from
a Christ-hating "holy book" of the Pharisee Religion.
Thus, the only choice
for Creationists now taking shape is this: Are you going to be a
Zohar/ Kabbala/ Pharisee Big Bang Evolutionary "creationist"
or the Bible/Christian Anti-Evolution Creationist the world believes
you to be?
No comments:
Post a Comment