Are Skeptics Honest?

Are Skeptics Honest?

As flat earth believers we are often faced with skeptics. Now, a healthy skeptic is good but what we face today are people who are very hostel to what we believe. So, let's examine this a bit further.

We now live in a nation where doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, the press destroys information, and false religion destroys morals, and banks destroy the economy. We are all in general agreement with this. So, I might add, that astronomers destroy astronomy.

A true skeptic seeks evidence and is always open to accepting or rejecting a new hypothesis based on that evidence. But more than this, it is necessary for a skeptic to remain skeptical of their own skepticism.

People who identify as skeptics more often than not, they are in fact, pseudo-skeptics who falsely claim to be impartial not swayed by ideology or prejudice.

These debunkers usually begin with their conclusions, and are overly fast to ridicule anything outside of the status quo. Acting as self-appointed thought police, they are highly dismissive of any evidence which doesn't conform with their world view. In the name of 'science' they actually sabotage new science and discovery.

As a side note, it's remarkable that these skeptics blindly accept any doctrine that the scientific and medical establishments promote, and assume these institutions be free from corruption and politics.

A person who is turned off by any additional information, and thus becomes a skeptic, is that their foundation is based on a false premise. Naturally, anything that is built on a false premise, that person will never be able to come to the truth. It's like a house that is built on a crooked foundation – not matter how high you go, the house is going to be crooked. Failing to admit that the foundation is off, you will never be able to test what you believe is really the truth or not.

When a foundation of any topic is laid either academia, for example, then you will accept anything else that they tell you, rather than examining the foundation. Like the spinning ball earth, if that is your foundation, then everything that is added to it, has to conform to it – even if it requires twisting the truth, lying outright, and using funny math that no one can figure out. It requires fake Moon landings and computer generated images to create a fake reality to conform to the heliocentric model of the earth that is given us.

We accept the foundation because we can't fathom that they would lie to us. If you are willing to suspend the belief that you are told, honestly look at alternative information, you would be able to honestly examine it to see if it's the truth or not.

Answering a Preacher About the Earth

Answering a Preacher About the Earth

Note: This video is not longer on YouTube, as certain things the Tech Giants don't want you to know. Their actions speaks volumes.

At about 8 minutes in: When Pastor Anderson said that it's shorter to fly from the US to Germany, you fly north over Canada. This is true but not for his answer. He said that on a globe earth this distance is shorter. Well, take out a globe and you measure it! Is it shorter by making an arch north or is it shorter by directly flying East? It would be shorter flying directly eastward! So, why don't we when we fly, say, from the US to Europe this way? I'll get back to this in a minute.

Laying out a map of the earth which is flat, the land is not laid out as we see it on a globe – just as Anderson said. So, why do we fly North when we fly East? Because it's shorter; BECAUSE the earth is flat. But the educational system and government does not want you to know that, so they give any explanation that makes sense but it's not.

There was a news item last year, about a flight from Taiwan to Los Angeles, California. A woman on board was giving birth so they had to make an EMERGENCY LANDING. Guess where they landed? In Alaska! Now, why on earth (excuse the pun) would the plane be flying over Alaska when it was going to southern California? It would be shorter to fly directly there; it would save time and money. The reason why is, that on a flat earth, the distance would be too great! So, even if you are coming from a latitude where Taiwan is to where California is, it's shorter to fly North and arch around.

If you fly from Florida to Germany, for example, you would still have to take that FAR northerly route over Canada. Why? The answer is given above.